Divergent thinking is cognition that leads in various directions. Some of these are conventional, and some original. Because some of the resulting ideas are original, divergent thinking represents the potential for creative thinking and problem solving.
What is an example of divergent thinking?
Some other examples of divergent thinking include: Wondering how many ways you can use a fork. Showing a person a photo and asking them to create a caption for the photo. Giving a child a stack of blocks and asking them to see how many shapes they can create with those blocks.
What is the best description of divergent thinking?
Divergent thinking, often referred to as lateral thinking, is the process of creating multiple, unique ideas or solutions to a problem that you are trying to solve. Through spontaneous, free-flowing thinking, divergent thinking requires coming up with many different answers or routes forward.
What is Convergent vs divergent thinking?
Summary. Convergent thinking focuses on finding one well-defined solution to a problem. Divergent thinking is the opposite of convergent thinking and involves more creativity. In this piece, we’ll explain the differences between convergent and divergent thinking in the problem-solving process.
What is divergent thinking in psychology? – Related Questions
What is convergent and divergent thinking with examples?
The convergent example asks for a vehicle, whereas the divergent example doesn’t rule out options like moving closer to work, telecommuting, walking, carpooling, or taking public transportation. Both examples will produce valuable results. The convergent example may be driven by other issues.
What is an example of convergent thinking?
Scientific experiments are great examples of convergent thinking. Scientists conduct experiments to find the best possible answer to a problem. Experiments also follow a logical sequence of events and compare unknowns to proven scientific facts.
What is convergent thinking?
Convergent thinking occurs when the solution to a problem can be deduced by applying established rules and logical reasoning. This type of reasoning involves solving a problem within the context of known information and narrowing down the solution based on logical inference.
What is the difference between converging or diverging?
Converging tectonic plates are the one that come towards each other and form a convergent boundary while diverging tectonic plates are the one that move away from each other and form divergent boundaries.
What is difference between convergent and divergent evolution?
Divergent evolution is when individuals in one species, or closely related species, acquire enough variations in their traits that it leads to two distinct new species. Convergent evolution on the other hand is when two unrelated species develop similar traits because they live in similar environments.
What is the difference between convergent and divergent validity?
Convergent validity tests that constructs that are expected to be related are, in fact, related. Discriminant validity (or divergent validity) tests that constructs that should have no relationship do, in fact, not have any relationship.
What is an example of divergent validity?
An example would be a test used by a company for hiring purposes that measures how proficient someone is at a particular skill. If the test correlates too strongly with an IQ test then it essentially is just another IQ test instead of measuring something different.
What is an example of convergent validity?
For example, the scores of two tests, one measuring self-esteem and the other measuring extroversion, are likely to be correlated—individuals scoring high in self-esteem are more likely to score high in extroversion. These two tests would then have high convergent validity.
What is good divergent validity?
Divergent validity helps to establish construct validity by demonstrating that the construct you are interested in (e.g., anger) is different from other constructs that might be present in your study (e.g., depression).
What is the strongest form of validity?
Each offers a slightly different approach, yet the first two methods (concurrent and predictive) are actually forms of the third (construct). Construct validity is the most general and most powerful method for showing that scores represent what they are designed to measure.
What are the four types of validity?
Table of contents
- Construct validity.
- Content validity.
- Face validity.
- Criterion validity.
What are the 6 types of validity?
The following six types of validity are popularly in use viz., Face validity, Content validity, Predictive validity, Concurrent, Construct and Factorial validity. Out of these, the content, predictive, concurrent and construct validity are the important ones used in the field of psychology and education.
What are the four threats to validity?
History, maturation, selection, mortality and interaction of selection and the experimental variable are all threats to the internal validity of this design.
What type of validity is most important?
Construct validity is the most important of the measures of validity. According to the American Educational Research Associate (1999), construct validity refers to “the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests”.
What are the 4 threats to external validity?
In this section, four of the main threats to external validity that you may face in your research are discussed with associated examples. These include: (a) selection biases; (b) constructs, methods and confounding; (c) the ‘real world’ versus the ‘experimental world’; and (d) history effects and maturation.
What is the biggest threat to internal validity?
Attrition bias is a threat to internal validity. In experiments, differential rates of attrition between treatment and control groups can skew results. This bias can affect the relationship between your independent and dependent variables. It can make variables appear to be correlated when they are not, or vice versa.
